Nov/Dec 2007
feature article
Change your brain
BY BARRY BURNETT, M.D.
Someone
you love wants you to change.
And that someone gives plenty of good reasons: the moods, perhaps; the
worries; the words that hurt more than you meant. And you agree, at least
privately. You’ve always wanted to live a calmer, more reasonable
life. You could take a pill, but you’re not feeling sad or bad enough
for that. Still, what if you could really change, become a whole new you?
You’re not ten years old anymore—can you still do that?
If ‘you’ is your mind, and your mind lives in your brain,
then it’s starting to look a lot like you can change. To look, in
fact, like your brain can alter and develop at any age, and probably in
the direction you need. Which is not to say it’s easy. But more
on that later, after we check out what neuroscientists are discovering
about growing a whole new you.
Imagine two storm fronts, converging. Coming together to form a real
rainmaker, enough to saturate a parched and arid land. One front rolling
in from the East, the very Far East, to bump into our own home front,
Medical Science, with its inexorable development of finer and finer-tuned
ways of looking at the brain.
For the Eastern action, we’ve got to thank a certain spiritual
rock star, the Dalai Lama. Booted towards the West by the Chinese invasion
of Tibet, he saw a chance for a greater synergy between his faith and
the modern world, and made it happen. “I am interested in the extent
to which the mind itself, and specific subtle thoughts, may have an influence
upon the brain,"1. He started by helping Harvard researchers meet
with Buddhist meditators—monks in caves, literally. Monks who initially
thought that their job was to teach the scientists how to meditate, to
discover the regions of the mind in the same way they did, from the outside
in.
The researchers had something much more external planned: objective
measurement. A goal that eventually took those inside-out meetings of
inquiring minds, under the Dalai Lama’s influence, to studies and
conferences up and down our own East (Coast) and at such semi-exotic sites
as the University of Wisconsin’s Affective Neuroscience lab. But
none of it would have happened without the courage to take the leap outside
the meditator’s head into the cold hard world of radiation and radioisotopes
and scans.
Because that home storm front of scientific Western thought was already
cooking up its own new view of the matters of the mind. By the eighties,
doctors could finally see, without a scalpel, into the tissues of a living
brain.
The revolution in imaging technology started with CAT and then MRI scans,
primarily used to see brain cancer and strokes in patients. Not only to
diagnose them, but to watch how they did as their diseases progressed
or, hopefully, quieted down. The assumption was that the adult brain was
fixed and unchanging—wiring in place, job done—except for
the damage that clots and blow-outs and crazed cell lines wrought. But
before long, researchers found that wasn’t always true: new connections
between the uninjured and injured side of the brain developed, and physical
therapy could lead to a regrown, thicker cortex, the outermost layer of
the brain.2 The scientists called it neuroplasticity, and when they looked,
they found similar changes in the parietal areas of hard-studying medical
students, in the cerebellar lobes of musicians working to improve their
skills, and in... well, let’s not get ahead of ourselves.
The problem was, those snapshots of one moment in a brain’s life
weren’t enough—to really understand what was going on, researchers
needed to see what was happening over time, the ongoing processes of thinking,
feeling, even relaxing. That neuroimaging need was first answered by PET
scans, in which patients are injected with positron-irradiated sugar water:
when active brain cells suck up the sugar, the liberated positrons shoot
back out through the skull, where their trajectories are used to draw
a living map, a map that changes as first one and then another active
region of the brain lights up. Since then have come SPECT scans, Functional
MRIs and more, all of which are being used today.
Medical research gravitates toward real world applications—okay,
towards big pharm money—and the huge and expensive imaging machines
were soon turned to the potentially lucrative mysteries of psychiatric
diagnosis and treatment. The studies were small but there were a lot of
them, from changes in brain-cell energy consumption, to blood supply,
to actually showing, in living color, the ebb and flow of neurotransmitters
like serotonin and GABA that can determine emotion and mood. What did
they find? That many, but not all, psychological problems seem to have
specific patterns of change in the brain, and that some drugs (like the
famous Prozac, which boosts serotonin) appear to reverse them. Scans to
develop drugs, scans to learn how best to treat. And, as the technology
became more affordable for less-endowed investigators, scans to look at
any brain activity you want.
Therapists, or at least the scientists interested in psychotherapy,
were next to dive into the neuroimaging pool. The most striking study
looked at cognitive-behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder,
and found that ten sessions not only worked, but changed the brain in
almost exactly the same way that those serotonin drugs did. Similar studies
of depression have shown equally potent changes in different areas, and
demonstrated effects from other forms of psychotherapy.3 They’re
still working on the differences, but it’s good to know that therapy
can be as effective as drugs—and good to know that some drugs work
in the same presumably positive, strengthening-not-weakening way as therapy.
However, your special someone isn’t that kind of concerned, and
you’re not feeling all that bad: no obsessive thoughts taking over,
nothing dark enough to pay for professional help. You just want to think
and feel, well, better. And if you want to change your brain, it’s
looking like meditation may be the way to go. Because this is where those
two storms come together—Eastern and Western techniques, meditation
and the ability to visualize mental processes, to look inside the brain.
The rain’s just beginning to fall, but a few striking findings are
beginning to trickle out. The Harvard crowd looked at CAT scans of skilled
Insight meditators, compared them to non-meditators, and found regions
of increased cortical thickness—that is, more brain—in the
meditators.4 Evidence of pure thought literally changing the shape of
the brain. Next came Functional MRI scans of Yoga practitioners, finding
that GABA levels spiked upwards during and after asana poses.5 It was
the same mood-elevating increase seen with some antidepressants—a
demonstrated change in brain chemistry that fit with those poser’s
(sorry) general sense of increased well-being.
Studies of Buddhist meditation have also been coming out of the University
of Wisconsin, documenting increased activity in brain areas associated
with happiness, empathy, and the control of emotional states. Much of
the work has looked at the most central of brain functions: how well that
gray matter pays attention. One group of beginners showed a marked improvement
after a three-month training program, and, according to Professor Richard
Davidson, "A significant increase in activation in left pre-frontal
regions of their brain... associated with a reduction in the amount of
anxiety that they reported.”6 Another study compared more-skilled
to less-skilled meditators, and found, to quote him again, that: “Attention
can be trained, and in a way that is not fundamentally different than
how physical exercise changes the body.”7 And that part about it
not being easy? Learning to pay attention can be a bit of work, but the
scans of the most-skilled monks demonstrated an ease that came with time,
“...that they were able to concentrate in an effortless way.”
Effortless? Not exactly, at least at the beginning, whether your focus
of attention is a set of asanas, the coming and going of your breath,
or a single word, perception or thought. And while there is that rush
of well-being that seems to be part of the deal, a compensating boon to
bring you back the next time, no physiologic change—except the obvious,
decomposition—comes without metabolic work. On some level, change
has got to take effort, as hard as building up those pecs. Say you’re
working on your memory, trying to beef it up before you get old. The scans
aren’t in to prove that one, but if it does help, it’s the
mental sweat that’ll get your neurons to make all those extra connections,
the ones you’re hoping will be a cushion if things start to fall
apart. You’ve learned checkers? Then master chess. Like those musicians,
bulking up their cerebelli with years of practice, or the medical students,
beating their way through those dense neuroimaging texts.
So you start meditating, and stick with it. And you do change, slowly,
over time, and get your new version of ‘you’. Not just an
older version—we all get that—but hopefully a better one,
both calmer and more attentive, with a plastic, moldable brain that keeps
growing through the decades. Maybe there’s even an extra payoff,
something beyond the elevated serotonin and GABA levels, when you seem
to connect to something... further. That’s another topic—neurotheology—and
it’s also beyond the scope of this brief review. Prayer, for instance,
can be viewed as another form of meditation, and at least one study of
prayer has demonstrated neurological change as well. There’s no
earthly reason why a bigger, better brain should be more capable of reaching
out that way, but meditation seems to bring the two together. Thought
to matter and then, perhaps, to spirit: East meets West again, at the
next level. Who knows when we’ll be able to image that?
Barry Burnett, MD, is a local physician and writer. For a few chapters
of his fictional look at the perils of imaging on the brain, visit thrillingromance.com.
Check out these related articles and books, for a readable way
in to these often-complex studies:
Yoga and Gaba: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/05/070521145516.htm
Skilled meditators and attention:
http://www.news.wisc.edu/13890
Meditation to train attention:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/05/070507202029.htm
http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20070512/fob2.asp
Meditation and Increased Cortical Thickness:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/22/health/22effe.html?ex=1189569600&en=21a20cf43822314f&ei=5070
Psychotherapy and the Brain:
http://www.intracarehospital.com/pages/psychotherapy.pdf
Begley - how thinking can change the brain
http://www.dalailama.com/news.112.htm
or
http://psyphz.psych.wisc.edu/web/News/wsj_1-19-07_begley.html
Sara Lazar—Massachusetts General Hospital—Meditation
experience is associated with increased cortical thickness.
Linden—How psychotherapy changes the brain—Molecular
psychology— (dense to the point of near-unreadability, but
its all in there)
Sharon Begley—Train Your Mind, Change Your
Brain—(WSJ article version at http://psyphz.psych.wisc.edu/web/News/wsj_1-19-07_begley.html)—readable
book about the dalai Lama and Harvard’s investigators.
The brain that Changes Itself, by Norman Doidge—patient
tales of neuroplasticity and recovery
Mind altering experiences that literally change your brain--
It you’re hurting, consider pharmacotherapy: reliable, easy, but
plan to keep on taking it. See your friendly local prescriber. And forget
the tranquillizers, sedatives, opiates and street drugs—they’ll
rearrange your brain, but only so you want more. Combining with psychotherapy
absolutely works wonders.
Psychotherapy: Hard, but it works—especially Cognitive
Behavioral Therapy (CBT). Eight or ten sessions and your gray matter could
be sporting a few permanent new curves.
Meditation: Clear, long-term changes, though you’ve
probably got to keep on doing it. On the other hand, it feels good, and
seems to make everybody else feel good, too. More for the cranky and dissatisfied
than the troubled. Yoga, mindfulness, TM; they all seem to work. Try a
few and decide which fits best.
For a cutting-edge passage through the brain, check out the White
Matter Atlas at www.DTIatlas.org.
Not that many can understand what these tiny jewel-like images mean—I
can’t—but they sure look cool.