Nov/Dec
2007
feature article
Change your brain
BY BARRY BURNETT, M.D.
Someone
you love wants
you to change.
And that someone gives plenty of good reasons: the moods,
perhaps; the worries; the words that hurt more than you
meant. And you agree, at least privately. You’ve
always wanted to live a calmer, more reasonable life.
You could take a pill, but you’re not feeling sad
or bad enough for that. Still, what if you could really
change, become a whole new you? You’re not ten years
old anymore—can you still do that?
If ‘you’ is your mind, and your mind lives
in your brain, then it’s starting to look a lot
like you can change. To look, in fact, like your brain
can alter and develop at any age, and probably in the
direction you need. Which is not to say it’s easy.
But more on that later, after we check out what neuroscientists
are discovering about growing a whole new you.
Imagine two storm fronts, converging. Coming together
to form a real rainmaker, enough to saturate a parched
and arid land. One front rolling in from the East, the
very Far East, to bump into our own home front, Medical
Science, with its inexorable development of finer and
finer-tuned ways of looking at the brain.
For the Eastern action, we’ve got to thank a certain
spiritual rock star, the Dalai Lama. Booted towards the
West by the Chinese invasion of Tibet, he saw a chance
for a greater synergy between his faith and the modern
world, and made it happen. “I am interested in the
extent to which the mind itself, and specific subtle thoughts,
may have an influence upon the brain,"1. He started
by helping Harvard researchers meet with Buddhist meditators—monks
in caves, literally. Monks who initially thought that
their job was to teach the scientists how to meditate,
to discover the regions of the mind in the same way they
did, from the outside in.
The researchers had something much more external planned:
objective measurement. A goal that eventually took those
inside-out meetings of inquiring minds, under the Dalai
Lama’s influence, to studies and conferences up
and down our own East (Coast) and at such semi-exotic
sites as the University of Wisconsin’s Affective
Neuroscience lab. But none of it would have happened without
the courage to take the leap outside the meditator’s
head into the cold hard world of radiation and radioisotopes
and scans.
Because that home storm front of scientific Western
thought was already cooking up its own new view of the
matters of the mind. By the eighties, doctors could finally
see, without a scalpel, into the tissues of a living brain.
The revolution in imaging technology started with CAT
and then MRI scans, primarily used to see brain cancer
and strokes in patients. Not only to diagnose them, but
to watch how they did as their diseases progressed or,
hopefully, quieted down. The assumption was that the adult
brain was fixed and unchanging—wiring in place,
job done—except for the damage that clots and blow-outs
and crazed cell lines wrought. But before long, researchers
found that wasn’t always true: new connections between
the uninjured and injured side of the brain developed,
and physical therapy could lead to a regrown, thicker
cortex, the outermost layer of the brain.2 The scientists
called it neuroplasticity, and when they looked, they
found similar changes in the parietal areas of hard-studying
medical students, in the cerebellar lobes of musicians
working to improve their skills, and in... well, let’s
not get ahead of ourselves.
The problem was, those snapshots of one moment in a
brain’s life weren’t enough—to really
understand what was going on, researchers needed to see
what was happening over time, the ongoing processes of
thinking, feeling, even relaxing. That neuroimaging need
was first answered by PET scans, in which patients are
injected with positron-irradiated sugar water: when active
brain cells suck up the sugar, the liberated positrons
shoot back out through the skull, where their trajectories
are used to draw a living map, a map that changes as first
one and then another active region of the brain lights
up. Since then have come SPECT scans, Functional MRIs
and more, all of which are being used today.
Medical research gravitates toward real world applications—okay,
towards big pharm money—and the huge and expensive
imaging machines were soon turned to the potentially lucrative
mysteries of psychiatric diagnosis and treatment. The
studies were small but there were a lot of them, from
changes in brain-cell energy consumption, to blood supply,
to actually showing, in living color, the ebb and flow
of neurotransmitters like serotonin and GABA that can
determine emotion and mood. What did they find? That many,
but not all, psychological problems seem to have specific
patterns of change in the brain, and that some drugs (like
the famous Prozac, which boosts serotonin) appear to reverse
them. Scans to develop drugs, scans to learn how best
to treat. And, as the technology became more affordable
for less-endowed investigators, scans to look at any brain
activity you want.
Therapists, or at least the scientists interested in
psychotherapy, were next to dive into the neuroimaging
pool. The most striking study looked at cognitive-behavioral
therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder, and found that
ten sessions not only worked, but changed the brain in
almost exactly the same way that those serotonin drugs
did. Similar studies of depression have shown equally
potent changes in different areas, and demonstrated effects
from other forms of psychotherapy.3 They’re still
working on the differences, but it’s good to know
that therapy can be as effective as drugs—and good
to know that some drugs work in the same presumably positive,
strengthening-not-weakening way as therapy.
However, your special someone isn’t that kind
of concerned, and you’re not feeling all that bad:
no obsessive thoughts taking over, nothing dark enough
to pay for professional help. You just want to think and
feel, well, better. And if you want to change your brain,
it’s looking like meditation may be the way to go.
Because this is where those two storms come together—Eastern
and Western techniques, meditation and the ability to
visualize mental processes, to look inside the brain.
The rain’s just beginning to fall, but a few striking
findings are beginning to trickle out. The Harvard crowd
looked at CAT scans of skilled Insight meditators, compared
them to non-meditators, and found regions of increased
cortical thickness—that is, more brain—in
the meditators.4 Evidence of pure thought literally changing
the shape of the brain. Next came Functional MRI scans
of Yoga practitioners, finding that GABA levels spiked
upwards during and after asana poses.5 It was the same
mood-elevating increase seen with some antidepressants—a
demonstrated change in brain chemistry that fit with those
poser’s (sorry) general sense of increased well-being.
Studies of Buddhist meditation have also been coming
out of the University of Wisconsin, documenting increased
activity in brain areas associated with happiness, empathy,
and the control of emotional states. Much of the work
has looked at the most central of brain functions: how
well that gray matter pays attention. One group of beginners
showed a marked improvement after a three-month training
program, and, according to Professor Richard Davidson,
"A significant increase in activation in left pre-frontal
regions of their brain... associated with a reduction
in the amount of anxiety that they reported.”6 Another
study compared more-skilled to less-skilled meditators,
and found, to quote him again, that: “Attention
can be trained, and in a way that is not fundamentally
different than how physical exercise changes the body.”7
And that part about it not being easy? Learning to pay
attention can be a bit of work, but the scans of the most-skilled
monks demonstrated an ease that came with time, “...that
they were able to concentrate in an effortless way.”
Effortless? Not exactly, at least at the beginning,
whether your focus of attention is a set of asanas, the
coming and going of your breath, or a single word, perception
or thought. And while there is that rush of well-being
that seems to be part of the deal, a compensating boon
to bring you back the next time, no physiologic change—except
the obvious, decomposition—comes without metabolic
work. On some level, change has got to take effort, as
hard as building up those pecs. Say you’re working
on your memory, trying to beef it up before you get old.
The scans aren’t in to prove that one, but if it
does help, it’s the mental sweat that’ll get
your neurons to make all those extra connections, the
ones you’re hoping will be a cushion if things start
to fall apart. You’ve learned checkers? Then master
chess. Like those musicians, bulking up their cerebelli
with years of practice, or the medical students, beating
their way through those dense neuroimaging texts.
So you start meditating, and stick with it. And you
do change, slowly, over time, and get your new version
of ‘you’. Not just an older version—we
all get that—but hopefully a better one, both calmer
and more attentive, with a plastic, moldable brain that
keeps growing through the decades. Maybe there’s
even an extra payoff, something beyond the elevated serotonin
and GABA levels, when you seem to connect to something...
further. That’s another topic—neurotheology—and
it’s also beyond the scope of this brief review.
Prayer, for instance, can be viewed as another form of
meditation, and at least one study of prayer has demonstrated
neurological change as well. There’s no earthly
reason why a bigger, better brain should be more capable
of reaching out that way, but meditation seems to bring
the two together. Thought to matter and then, perhaps,
to spirit: East meets West again, at the next level. Who
knows when we’ll be able to image that?
Barry Burnett, MD, is a local physician and writer.
For a few chapters of his fictional look at the perils
of imaging on the brain, visit thrillingromance.com.
Check out these related articles and books, for
a readable way in to these often-complex studies:
Yoga and Gaba: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/05/070521145516.htm
Skilled meditators and attention:
http://www.news.wisc.edu/13890
Meditation to train attention:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/05/070507202029.htm
http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20070512/fob2.asp
Meditation and Increased Cortical Thickness:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/22/health/22effe.html?ex=1189569600&en=
21a20cf43822314f&ei=5070
Psychotherapy and the Brain:
http://www.intracarehospital.com/pages/psychotherapy.pdf
Begley - how thinking can change the brain
http://www.dalailama.com/news.112.htm
or
http://psyphz.psych.wisc.edu/web/News/wsj_1-19-07_begley.html
Sara Lazar—Massachusetts General
Hospital—Meditation experience is associated
with increased cortical thickness.
Linden—How psychotherapy changes
the brain—Molecular psychology— (dense
to the point of near-unreadability, but its all in there)
Sharon Begley—Train Your Mind,
Change Your Brain—(WSJ article version at http://psyphz.psych.wisc.edu/web/News/wsj_1-19-07_begley.html)—readable
book about the dalai Lama and Harvard’s investigators.
The brain that Changes Itself, by Norman Doidge—patient
tales of neuroplasticity and recovery
Mind altering experiences that literally change
your brain--
It you’re hurting, consider pharmacotherapy: reliable,
easy, but plan to keep on taking it. See your friendly
local prescriber. And forget the tranquillizers, sedatives,
opiates and street drugs—they’ll rearrange
your brain, but only so you want more. Combining with
psychotherapy absolutely works wonders.
Psychotherapy: Hard, but it works—especially
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). Eight or ten sessions
and your gray matter could be sporting a few permanent
new curves.
Meditation: Clear, long-term changes,
though you’ve probably got to keep on doing it.
On the other hand, it feels good, and seems to make everybody
else feel good, too. More for the cranky and dissatisfied
than the troubled. Yoga, mindfulness, TM; they all seem
to work. Try a few and decide which fits best.
For a cutting-edge passage through the brain, check out
the White Matter Atlas at www.DTIatlas.org.
Not that many can understand what these tiny jewel-like
images mean—I can’t—but they sure look
cool.
|